Janie Not-So-Long Hair

I'm getting back to sewing. Blood, sweat, and tears will follow. I am so sure.

Saturday, October 27, 2007

Boiled nuts help protect against illness

Fri Oct 26, 3:45 PM ET

BIRMINGHAM, Ala. - For lovers of boiled peanuts, there's some good news from the health front. A new study by a group of Huntsville researchers found that boiled peanuts bring out up to four times more chemicals that help protect against disease than raw, dry or oil-roasted nuts.

Lloyd Walker, chair of Alabama A&M University's Department of Food and Animal Sciences who co-authored the study, said these phytochemicals have antioxidant qualities that protect cells against the risk of degenerative diseases, including cancers, diabetes and heart disease.

"Boiling is a better method of preparing peanuts in order to preserve these phytochemicals," Walker said.

The study will appear in Wednesday's edition of the American Chemical Society's Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. The other co-authors in the study are A&M researchers Yvonne Chukwumah and Martha Verghese, as well as University of Alabama in Huntsville researcher Bernhard Vogler.

Walker said peanuts and other plants use phytochemicals for things such as helping avoid disease and insect attacks.

"These things are not nutrients; at the same time they have health benefits to humans," he told The Birmingham News. "The trick is to keep those health benefits, not to process them out of the foods."

According to Walker, water and heat penetrate the nuts, releasing beneficial chemicals to a certain point. Overcooking the nuts destroys the useful elements.

Alabama is third in the nation in the amount of peanuts produced with a crop valued at more than $67 million last year.

___

Information from: The Birmingham News

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071026/ap_on_he_me/boiled_peanuts

Thursday, October 18, 2007

CAT Scan: clear. Now what?

I stopped by the allergist's office this morning. As he entered, the nurse caught him to discuss my case. "Bring her back to an exam room..."

My CAT Scan showed nothing. My sinuses are fine. My allergies are behaving themsleves. So WHY am I still running fever? We discussed various possibilities, but I need to go see my primary doctor for more tests.

Currently, it is 78 degrees in the house. I'm running 99.4. I'm so tired of this.

Labels: , ,

Thursday, October 11, 2007

Found It

Most of you know I've been sick with a sinus "something" since the second week of August. When I saw my doctors the second week of Septmember, they agreed I had been sick long enough. The osteopath prescribed an antibiotic. The allergist said if I wasn't better by October 1 to go get a CAT scan.

He gave me a prescription sheet with the "CAT scan" authorization on it. I hung the little sheet on the calendar for three weeks.

When it was obvious Friday, October 5, that I was STILL sick, I took down the little piece of paper to try and call around to find out where to get the CAT scan done. The person that answered the phone at my insurance company was totally useless, so I put the little paper away.

Then I couldn't find it any where. It was lost.

I have searched for a week for the damned piece of paper. Finally, I called the allergist's office on Tuesday to ask for another one. "Call before coming by on Thursday" were my instructions. I called this morning at 9 AM. At a few minutes to Noon, my call was returned. "Come pick up your new CAT scan prescription."

I drove through at least three construction zones in packed, lunch-time traffic to get to the allergist's office. New little paper in hand, I walked back to Karl the Wonder Truck.

"I shouldn't just shove this in my purse. It will probably get ripped that way. I should put it some place safe... like... my... wallet..."

Guess what was in my wallet?

I go for my CAT scan Monday, if child care arrangements can be made. All prayers cheerfully accepted.

Sunday, October 07, 2007

Tiny tin whiskers imperil electronics

By JORDAN ROBERTSON, AP Technology Writer Sat Oct 6, 2:23 AM ET

SAN JOSE, Calif. - They've ruined missiles, silenced communications satellites and forced nuclear power plants to shut down. Pacemakers, consumer gadgets and even a critical part of a space shuttle have fallen victim.

The culprits? Tiny splinters — whiskers, they're called — that sprout without warning from tin solder and finishes deep inside electronics. By some estimates, the resulting short-circuits have leveled as much as $10 billion in damage since they were first noticed in the 1940s.

Now some electronics makers worry the destruction will be more widespread, and the dollar amounts more draining, as the European Union and governments around the world enact laws to eliminate the best-known defense — lead — from electronic devices.

"The EU's decision was irresponsible and not based on sound science," said Joe Smetana, a principal engineer and tin whisker expert with French telecommunications equipment maker Alcatel-Lucent SA. "We're solving a problem that isn't and creating a bunch of new ones."

Typically measuring under a millimeter long, tin whiskers look like errant strands of static-charged hair, erupting in every direction from tin-based materials like solder. Their cause is hotly debated. Other metals also grow whiskers, but not like tin.

Trouble arises when the whiskers bridge separate parts of increasingly miniaturized circuit boards. They also can flake off and interfere with sensitive optics.

While scientists debate their cause, they agree on one thing: Small amounts of lead mixed with the tin have been remarkably effective at preventing whisker eruptions for decades.

Lead, however, is a serious health concern. In children, it can cause learning or behavioral problems and has been associated with anemia and kidney problems. In adults, exposure has been linked to high blood pressure and reproductive organ damage.

Last year, Europeans barred the toxic metal from most electronics to prevent its being incinerated or accumulating in dumps after computers and other gadgets are tossed out. Similar measures are being considered or are already in place in other countries, including Japan, China, South Korea, Argentina, Australia and the United States.

Some companies say the EU rules threaten the reliability of their products, exposing them to unknown risks and possibly threatening people's safety.

But EU officials say the regulations banning lead, cadmium, mercury and three other hazardous substances are needed to protect people and the environment.

They also note that many types of electronics are exempt from the law, including military and other national security equipment, medical devices, and servers, data storage computers and telecommunications gear that use leaded solders.

Exemptions are also granted when alternatives to the hazardous materials don't exist yet, or because the substances can't be replaced without jeopardizing safety.

Still, even some companies with exemptions say it's getting harder to buy the leaded parts. They worry about the increased risk of pure-tin parts, the culprit behind the most devastating tin-whisker-related failures.

"Over time (the failures) are just going to get worse and worse and worse," said Jim McElroy, executive director of International Electronics Manufacturing Initiative, or iNEMI, a group of big electronics makers, government agencies and other parties active in tin whisker research.

"Even if the military is exempt forever, they will be forced to convert because they can't get the components they want," he said. "And that will eventually happen across the board."

Tin whiskers have left a trail of destruction in a string of important machinery, chronicled in an extensive database of publicly disclosed failures kept by researchers at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md.

Last year, for example, NASA engineers testing parts for the space shuttle Endeavour discovered that millions of tin whiskers were causing an electronic box to inaccurately point the shuttle's engine, knocking the rocket's trajectory off-kilter, according to Henning Leidecker, chief engineer of the electronic parts office of NASA's Goddard and a tin whisker expert.

It turns out NASA had approved the pure-tin-coated clamps used for holding circuit boards in place back when the electronics were made in the 1980s, before NASA adopted its current rule requiring a small amount of lead in its tin coatings.

"These whiskers have the potential to destroy missions," Leidecker said.

Failures blamed on tin whiskers have run the gamut of devices and manufacturers.

In the 1980s, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration recalled some pacemakers because of a high failure rate caused by tin whiskers.

In 1998, PanAmSat Corp.'s $250 million Galaxy IV communications satellite, which provided service to tens of millions of pagers across North America and thousands of pay-at-the-pump gas station machines, was deemed a total loss after two processors failed. The main spacecraft control processor, which governs the satellite's positioning and other functions, failed for an unknown reason, and the backup couldn't be used because tin whiskers had shorted it out a year before.

At least 10 other satellite failures have been blamed on tin whiskers, according to the NASA database.

Over the past two decades, also according to the NASA database, nuclear power plants have been temporarily shut down at least seven times after tin whiskers in the alarm system circuit boards triggered false alarms, alerting managers to threats that didn't exist. There have been no reported injuries.

"There's a real loss of money because the plant is shut down and stays down, and it also presents a situation where workers are taught not to believe the alarms," Leidecker said. "Are you comfortable with that? I am not."

The military also isn't immune. Whisker-related malfunctions have been reported in the radar used aboard fighter jets, in the target-detection system of certain missiles, along with various unspecified problems in other parts of the U.S. military's missile programs.

Little is known about those failures, other than the part that failed and the cause. Most involve military secrets and are only known because they're revealed in technical forums by defense contractors, who incur heavy repair expenses for malfunctioning tin-whisker-infested equipment and are active in scientific circles looking for a fix that doesn't involve lead.

Tin whisker experts said the industry is working fast to come up with a lead-free solution. So far, other materials have shown to be effective in preventing tin whiskers, but not as powerfully as lead.

One promising remedy is tin-silver-copper solders, said George Galyon, a senior technical staff member at IBM Corp. However, Galyon noted that lead-free solders often require much higher temperatures, which can warp circuit boards and cause materials to degrade.

Despite the setbacks, he said the major players realize anti-lead laws give them no choice.

"It's whistling in the wind if you think we're turning this back," he said. "China's full-bent on it, the major markets are into it. The world flipped over in one fell swoop."

___

On the Net:

NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center tin whisker page: http://nepp.nasa.gov/whisker/

iNEMI page: http://www.inemi.org/cms/

Thursday, October 04, 2007

Adding to what I said yesterday...

After I finished the post about the weight loss and new bras, I dropped a Popcicle down my cleavage.

It was STARTLING.

It was EXCITING.

It was damned cold.

I pulled the Popcicle out of my new lilac bra and finished eating it. I hope the new bra isn't stained with Purple Dye Number Whatever.

Failed Save.

Been there. Done that. Got the dice to prove it.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/wilwheaton/302381709/

Note who the photographer is...

Wednesday, October 03, 2007

As I was saying just the other day...

(Same post on all my blogs.)

I've lost some weight. I know this isn't news flash material, but it caused a small change in my life.


Several years ago, Sweet Hubby got major husband points by presenting me with Victoria's Secret undies for our anniversary. He had waited until I went to bed, the cruised their web site, making notes of all the styles he liked. When he walked into the store with his list, the sales lady was happy to race around and show him all the items in person. (She was either happy cause Hubby is a hunk or he was there to OBVIOUSLY SPEND MONEY...)

Hubby bought the wrong band size. I couldn't wear the bras, even on the very last (largest) hole. Birthing that boy really expanded my rib cage. I had to go into VS and exchange the bras. The panties were fine. (Mumble something about he knows my butt better...)

(Fast forward four years.)

So, just this Summer, I noticed all my bras were getting loose in the band. Even on the smallest size hook, we still had major slippage. I tossed out a few bras that were obviously past their prime. It was then time to go shopping for more bras.

I still think it was smart of me to grab bras of different colors to represent the different sizes. Even with glasses off, I had no problem with which was which. The white bra was the size I've been buying for the last four years. The pink bra is the size I used to buy before the Boy Child.

The pink bra fit better.

I returned to the display and put back the white bra. Of course, there weren't any white bras in the size I needed. I found a pale cream bra that would suffice. The pink bra was already in my basket. It was a tough decision, but I had to get the lilac bra. Had to.

I'm wearing the lilac bra as I type this. The hook is on the last (biggest) hole. As these bras stretch with age, I'll be able to continue to keep them snug against my ribs by adjusting to the smaller sizes.

I'm sure this was absolutely Too Much Information, but this is about as exciting as my life gets at the moment. Merchandise returns, lunch at Subway two days running, and school meetings for children just aren't interesting enough to blog about.
Be blessed.

Labels: ,